Documentation · rigging

Lifting Lug Calculator - methodology & sources

The Lifting Lug Calculator verifies single-plate lifting lugs / padeyes with checks organised into four methodology families. The selected route becomes the primary utilisation basis; every other family is still computed and shown as an independent cross-check. Mechanics-of-materials identities compute raw stresses against user-supplied allowables; code-route checks are active only where the underlying clause and a worked validation example have been verified. Xarpis never invents formulas.

Mechanics of Materials

CheckDescriptionStatus
Net-section tension (mechanics)Average tensile stress across the plate's net cross-section through the pin hole.Implemented
Double-plane shear-out (mechanics)Average shear stress on the two tear-out planes between hole and free edge.Implemented
Pin bearing on lug (mechanics)Nominal projected bearing stress between pin and lug plate.Implemented
Pin double shear (mechanics)Average shear stress on two pin cross-sections (single lug in clevis).Implemented
Fillet weld throat resultant (mechanics)Angle-aware throat-resultant stress on the fillet weld group: compared to the user-supplied shear allowable.Implemented
Fillet weld von Mises throat stress (mechanics)von Mises equivalent stress on the fillet weld throat, .Implemented
Fillet weld strength - AISC 360-22 §J2.4AISC 360-22 §J2.4 nominal fillet-weld throat strength with the directional strength increase ; ASD .Implemented
Base section combined stress (mechanics)Combined axial + biaxial bending + shear at the lug base section (cantilever model), von Mises vs the user tensile allowable.Implemented

ASME BTH-1-2020

CheckDescriptionStatus
Net-section tension - BTH-1 §3-3.3.1Static allowable tensile strength of the pin-connected plate per BTH-1-2020 §3-3.3.1 (eqs 3-45 through 3-48).Implemented
Single-plane fracture - BTH-1 §3-3.3.1Single-plane tension fracture on the ligament beyond the pin hole (eq 3-49).Implemented
Double-plane shear-out - BTH-1 §3-3.3.1Tear-out (double-plane shear) strength of the pin-connected plate (eqs 3-50 to 3-52).Implemented
Pin bearing - BTH-1 §3-3.3.4Static or rotating pin-bearing allowable; switches formula based on BTH-1 Service Class.Implemented
Fillet weld allowable - BTH-1 §3-3.4.3BTH-1 allowable fillet-weld stress: resultant throat stress vs .Implemented
Base section interaction - BTH-1 eq (3-35)Tension + biaxial bending interaction at the lug base per BTH-1 eq (3-35), with §3-2.3.3/§3-2.3.4 rectangular-bar bending allowables.Implemented
Base section critical stress - BTH-1 eq (3-37)Combined normal + shear critical stress at the lug base per BTH-1 §3-2.5 (eq 3-37).Implemented
Base section shear - BTH-1 eq (3-28)Average shear at the lug base per BTH-1 §3-2.3.6 (eq 3-28), with the clause's h/t validity gate.Implemented

EN 1993-1-8:2005 §3.13

CheckDescriptionStatus
Pin-plate geometry - EC3 §3.13.1Minimum end/edge distances for pin-connected plates per Table 3.9 Type A (given thickness); and measured from the hole edge.Implemented
Pin shear - EC3 §3.13.2Shear resistance of the pin at two planes: .Implemented
Plate bearing - EC3 §3.13.2Plate/pin bearing resistance from Table 3.10.Implemented
Pin bending - EC3 §3.13.2Pin bending resistance against from Figure 3.11 ().Implemented
Pin combined shear + bending - EC3 §3.13.2Interaction on the pin: per Table 3.10.Implemented
Fillet weld - EN 1993-1-8 §4.5.3.2 directional methodDirectional check on the throat: and .Implemented
Fillet weld - EN 1993-1-8 §4.5.3.3 simplified methodSimplified check: with .Implemented
Base section yield criterion - EN 1993-1-1 eq (6.1)Elastic yield criterion at the lug base section per EN 1993-1-1 §6.2.1(5) eq (6.1).Implemented

DNV-ST-N001 §16

CheckDescriptionStatus
Dynamic amplification factor - DNV-ST-N001 §16 from DNV-ST-N001 Table 16-1: environment column (onshore / inshore / offshore) + weight band, with the t formula cells (user-overridable).Implemented
Skew-load factor - DNV-ST-N001 §16Skew multiplier applied to the rigging load for a single-lug padeye (user-overridable).Implemented
Lift-point consequence factor - DNV-ST-N001 §16.8.3 multiplier from Table 16-5 (1.30 for lift points and attachments), applied to the DNV design load (user-overridable).Implemented

Source registry

Metadata only - no copyrighted standard text is reproduced. Every implemented check cites at least one traceable source below.

  • Mechanics of Materials - net-section tension

    Average tensile stress on the net cross-section through the pin hole: . Classical identity; no code-specific allowable applied.

  • Mechanics of Materials - double-plane shear-out

    Average shear stress on two tear-out planes between hole and free edge: , where . Classical identity; no code-specific allowable applied.

  • Mechanics of Materials - bearing stress

    Nominal bearing stress on the projected pin-on-plate area: . Classical identity; no code-specific allowable applied.

  • Mechanics of Materials - pin double shear

    Average shear stress on two pin cross-sections (single-lug in clevis): . Classical identity; no code-specific allowable applied.

  • Mechanics of Materials - fillet weld throat resultant

    Resultant throat stress on a fillet weld group with angle-aware demand decomposition , , . Root components and give throat components and ; is compared to the user-supplied shear allowable. No or electrode-specific factor applied.

  • Mechanics of Materials - von Mises throat stress

    Combined throat stress for a fillet weld group using the von Mises equivalent , compared to the user-supplied tensile allowable (falls back to ).

  • AISC 360-22 §J2.4 (2022) · §J2.4, Eq. J2-5 (directional strength increase)

    Nominal fillet-weld strength per unit throat area , where is the angle between the line of action of the force resultant and the weld longitudinal axis. ASD safety factor per §B3.2.

  • AWS A2.4 - Standard Symbols for Welding, Brazing, and Nondestructive Examination

    Weld-symbol conventions used in the schematic: triangular fillet-weld reference marker on the side of the joint to be welded, with the weld-all-around circle on the reference line when the perimeter is closed.

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-3.3.1 (2020) · §3-3.3.1 (eqs 3-45 through 3-48)

    Static strength of pin-connected plate - tension on the effective net area either side of the pin hole, with reduction for pin/hole clearance and . Allowable includes design factor per §3-1.3.

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-3.3.1 (2020) · §3-3.3.1 (eq 3-49)

    Single-plane fracture strength beyond the pin hole: , with measured from the hole centre to the plate edge in the direction of the applied load.

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-3.3.1 (2020) · §3-3.3.1 (eqs 3-50 through 3-52)

    Double-plane shear-out strength: , with and allowable .

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-3.3.4 (2020) · §3-3.3.4 (eqs 3-53 / 3-54)

    Pin bearing strength on the lug plate. Static bearing allowable ; rotating (Service Class ) reduced to .

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-3.4.3 (2020) · §3-3.4.3 (eq 3-55)

    Allowable fillet-weld shear on the effective throat . Extended to combined in-plane loading by comparing the resultant throat stress against the clause allowable.

  • EN 1993-1-8:2005 §4.5.3.2 (2005) · §4.5.3.2 (directional method)

    Directional check for a fillet weld throat. Two criteria: and . Correlation factor taken from Table 4.1 based on the weaker joined steel grade.

  • EN 1993-1-8:2005 §4.5.3.3 (2005) · §4.5.3.3 (simplified method)

    Simplified check on the weld throat as a vector shear: with . Conservative relative to the directional method; shown as a cross-check.

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-1.3 (2020) · §3-1.3

    Design factor : for Design Category A, for Design Category B. Applied to all §3-3 allowables.

  • EN 1993-1-8:2005 §3.13.1 (2005) · §3.13.1, Table 3.9 (Type A - given thickness)

    Geometric requirements for pin-connected plates, Type A (given thickness ): and , where and are measured from the edge of the hole to the plate end / side edge. The Type B (given geometry) alternative , applies only to the specific lug shape drawn in Table 3.9 and is reported informatively.

  • EN 1993-1-8:2005 §3.13.2 (2005) · §3.13.2, Table 3.10 (shear)

    Pin shear resistance per plane: . A single-lug / clevis assembly presents two shear planes.

  • EN 1993-1-8:2005 §3.13.2 (2005) · §3.13.2, Table 3.10 (bearing)

    Pin/plate bearing resistance: .

  • EN 1993-1-8:2005 §3.13.2 (2005) · §3.13.2, Table 3.10 & Figure 3.11 (bending)

    Pin bending resistance: with . The demand follows Figure 3.11: ; evaluated when the user supplies the shackle fork geometry (jaw thickness and either inside-jaw width or clearance ).

  • EN 1993-1-8:2005 §3.13.2 (2005) · §3.13.2, Table 3.10 & Figure 3.11 (combined)

    Combined shear + bending interaction on the pin: . Gated on the same shackle fork geometry as the pin-bending check.

  • Mechanics of Materials - cantilever base section

    The lug is a rectangular cantilever plate fixed at the base section, loaded at the pin a lever arm above it. Load decomposition , ; base actions , , , , ; section , , . Classical identities; the mechanics check compares the combined von Mises stress against the user-supplied allowable.

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §1-6.1 (2020) · §1-6.1

    Material constants used by the standard's member equations: MPa, MPa.

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-2.3.3 (2020) · §3-2.3.3 (eqs 3-19 through 3-24)

    Major-axis bending of solid rectangular bars, banded by : ; ; . braced, else . Page-verified 2026-08-12.

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-2.3.4 (2020) · §3-2.3.4 (eq 3-25)

    Minor-axis bending of solid rectangular sections: .

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-2.4(c) (2020) · §3-2.4(c) (eq 3-35), with §3-2.1 (eq 3-1) for $F_t$

    Combined axial tension and biaxial bending: , with on the gross section. Reduces to the §3-2.3.5 biaxial criterion (eq 3-26) when .

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-2.5 (2020) · §3-2.5 (eq 3-37)

    Combined normal and shear stresses at a point: . At the lug base corner (free surface).

  • ASME BTH-1-2020 §3-2.3.6 (2020) · §3-2.3.6 (eq 3-28)

    Average shear stress on bars, pins, and plates: , valid for where is the clear plate depth parallel to the applied shear. Beyond that limit the clause requires a buckling method with the §3-1.3 design factor - the check reports indeterminate rather than a number.

  • EN 1993-1-1:2005 §6.2.1(5) (2005) · §6.2.1(5), eq (6.1)

    Elastic yield criterion at a critical point; with : . Applied at the lug base section extreme fibre.

  • DNV-ST-N001 §16.2.5 (2018, amended 2020-01) · §16.2.5, Table 16-1 (DAF in air, excluding elevated jackups)

    Dynamic amplification factor from Table 16-1 by environment column and static hook load. For t: onshore , inshore , offshore ; banded constants above 100 t. Items lighter than 3 t are taken as 3 t (note 1). SHL includes rigging weight - the app approximates SHL with the design load; user-overridable.

  • DNV-ST-N001 §16.2.6 (2018, amended 2020-01) · §16.2.6 (skew load factor)

    Skew-load factor for rigging tolerance / force-distribution effects. §16.2.6.9 permits for statically determinate lifts; the default 1.10 is retained as a conservative baseline for a single-lug padeye. Multi-sling redistribution is out of scope for v1.

  • DNV-ST-N001 §16.8.3 (2018, amended 2020-01) · §16.8.3, Table 16-5 (consequence factors)

    Consequence factor applied to lift points including their attachments to the structure: per Table 16-5, applied together with all relevant §16.2 factors per §16.8.4.1. Members directly supporting or framing into the lift points use (out of scope for this single-lug check set).

Units

All internal calculation is in canonical SI (N, mm, MPa). Inputs and results display in SI or US customary via the calculator's unit toggle; the engine result is identical in both systems.

Scope

This calculator covers single-plate lugs under in-plane loading. Out-of-plane loading, fatigue beyond the BTH-1 service-class derating, multi-plate cheek-plate lugs, and geometries that trigger the built-in scope flags are outside v1. The calculator surfaces these as warnings in the UI and on the report, and recommends FEA where appropriate.

Lifting Lug Calculator - methodology & sources · Xarpis